按官方修改的示例:
#MidServerClient.java
import feign.Param;
import org.springframework.cloud.openfeign.FeignClient;
import org.springframework.web.bind.annotation.RequestMapping;
import org.springframework.web.bind.annotation.RequestMethod;
@FeignClient(value = "edu-mid-server")
public interface MidServerClient {
@RequestMapping(value = "/test/header", method = RequestMethod.GET)
@Headers({"userInfo:{userInfo}"})
Object headerTest(@Param("userInfo") String userInfo);
}
提示错误:
java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: method GET must not have a request body.
分析
通过断点debug发现feign发请求时把userInfo参数当成了requestBody来处理,而okhttp3会检测get请求不允许有body(其他类型的请求哪怕不报错,但因为不是设置到请求头,依然不满足需求)。
查阅官方文档里是通过Contract(Feign.Contract.Default)来解析注解的:
Feign annotations define the Contract between the interface and how the underlying client should work. Feign's default contract defines the following annotations:
Annotation | Interface Target | Usage |
---|---|---|
@RequestLine | Method | Defines the HttpMethod and UriTemplate for request. Expressions, values wrapped in curly-braces {expression} are resolved using their corresponding @Param annotated parameters. |
@Param | Parameter | Defines a template variable, whose value will be used to resolve the corresponding template Expression, by name. |
@Headers | Method, Type | Defines a HeaderTemplate; a variation on a UriTemplate. that uses @Param annotated values to resolve the corresponding Expressions. When used on a Type, the template will be applied to every request. When used on a Method, the template will apply only to the annotated method. |
@QueryMap | Parameter | Defines a Map of name-value pairs, or POJO, to expand into a query string. |
@HeaderMap | Parameter | Defines a Map of name-value pairs, to expand into Http Headers |
@Body | Method | Defines a Template, similar to a UriTemplate and HeaderTemplate, that uses @Param annotated values to resolve the corresponding Expressions. |
从自动配置类找到使用的是spring cloud的SpringMvcContract(用来解析@RequestMapping相关的注解),而这个注解并不会处理解析上面列的注解
@Configuration
public class FeignClientsConfiguration {
@Bean
@ConditionalOnMissingBean
public Contract feignContract(ConversionService feignConversionService) {
return new SpringMvcContract(this.parameterProcessors, feignConversionService);
}
解决
原因找到了:spring cloud使用了自己的SpringMvcContract来解析注解,导致默认的注解解析方式失效。 解决方案自然就是重新解析处理feign的注解,这里通过自定义Contract继承SpringMvcContract再把Feign.Contract.Default解析逻辑般过来即可(重载的方法是在SpringMvcContract基础上做进一步解析,否则Feign对RequestMapping相关对注解解析会失效)
代码如下(此处只对@Headers、@Param重新做了解析):
#FeignCustomContract.java
import feign.Headers;
import feign.MethodMetadata;
import feign.Param;
import org.springframework.cloud.openfeign.AnnotatedParameterProcessor;
import org.springframework.cloud.openfeign.support.SpringMvcContract;
import org.springframework.core.convert.ConversionService;
import java.lang.annotation.Annotation;
import java.lang.reflect.Method;
import java.util.*;
import static feign.Util.checkState;
import static feign.Util.emptyToNull;
public class FeignCustomContract extends SpringMvcContract {
public FeignCustomContract(List<AnnotatedParameterProcessor> annotatedParameterProcessors, ConversionService conversionService) {
super(annotatedParameterProcessors, conversionService);
}
@Override
protected void processAnnotationOnMethod(MethodMetadata data, Annotation methodAnnotation, Method method) {
//解析mvc的注解
super.processAnnotationOnMethod(data, methodAnnotation, method);
//解析feign的headers注解
Class<? extends Annotation> annotationType = methodAnnotation.annotationType();
if (annotationType == Headers.class) {
String[] headersOnMethod = Headers.class.cast(methodAnnotation).value();
checkState(headersOnMethod.length > 0, "Headers annotation was empty on method %s.", method.getName());
data.template().headers(toMap(headersOnMethod));
}
}
@Override
protected boolean processAnnotationsOnParameter(MethodMetadata data, Annotation[] annotations, int paramIndex) {
boolean isMvcHttpAnnotation = super.processAnnotationsOnParameter(data, annotations, paramIndex);
boolean isFeignHttpAnnotation = false;
for (Annotation annotation : annotations) {
Class<? extends Annotation> annotationType = annotation.annotationType();
if (annotationType == Param.class) {
Param paramAnnotation = (Param) annotation;
String name = paramAnnotation.value();
checkState(emptyToNull(name) != null, "Param annotation was empty on param %s.", paramIndex);
nameParam(data, name, paramIndex);
isFeignHttpAnnotation = true;
if (!data.template().hasRequestVariable(name)) {
data.formParams().add(name);
}
}
}
return isMvcHttpAnnotation || isFeignHttpAnnotation;
}
private static Map<String, Collection<String>> toMap(String[] input) {
Map<String, Collection<String>> result =
new LinkedHashMap<String, Collection<String>>(input.length);
for (String header : input) {
int colon = header.indexOf(':');
String name = header.substring(0, colon);
if (!result.containsKey(name)) {
result.put(name, new ArrayList<String>(1));
}
result.get(name).add(header.substring(colon + 1).trim());
}
return result;
}
}
#FeignCustomConfiguration.java
import feign.Contract;
import org.springframework.beans.factory.annotation.Autowired;
import org.springframework.boot.autoconfigure.condition.ConditionalOnProperty;
import org.springframework.cloud.openfeign.AnnotatedParameterProcessor;
import org.springframework.context.annotation.Bean;
import org.springframework.context.annotation.Configuration;
import org.springframework.core.convert.ConversionService;
import java.util.ArrayList;
import java.util.List;
@Configuration
public class FeignCustomConfiguration {
@Autowired(required = false)
private List<AnnotatedParameterProcessor> parameterProcessors = new ArrayList<>();
@Bean
@ConditionalOnProperty(name = "feign.feign-custom-contract", havingValue = "true", matchIfMissing = true)
public Contract feignContract(ConversionService feignConversionService) {
return new FeignCustomContract(this.parameterProcessors, feignConversionService);
}
改完马上进行新一顿的操作, 看请求日志已经设置成功,响应OK!:
请求: {"type":"OKHTTP_REQ","uri":"/test/header","httpMethod":"GET","header":"{"accept":["/"],"userinfo":["{"userId":"sssss","phone":"13544445678],"x-b3-parentspanid":["e49c55484f6c19af"],"x-b3-sampled":["0"],"x-b3-spanid":["1d131b4ccd08d964"],"x-b3-traceid":["9405ce71a13d8289"]}","param":""}
响应 {"type":"OKHTTP_RESP","uri":"/test/header","respStatus":0,"status":200,"time":5,"header":"{"cache-control":["no-cache,no-store,max-age=0,must-revalidate"],"connection":["keep-alive"],"content-length":["191"],"content-type":["application/json;charset=UTF-8"],"date":["Fri,11Oct201913:02:41GMT"],"expires":["0"],"pragma":["no-cache"],"x-content-type-options":["nosniff"],"x-frame-options":["DENY"],"x-xss-protection":["1;mode=block"]}"}
(另一种实现请求头的方式:实现RequestInterceptor,但是存在hystrix线程切换的坑)
到此这篇关于SpringCloud中分析讲解Feign组件添加请求头有哪些坑梳理的文章就介绍到这了,更多相关SpringCloud Feign组件内容请搜索三水点靠木以前的文章或继续浏览下面的相关文章希望大家以后多多支持三水点靠木!
SpringCloud中分析讲解Feign组件添加请求头有哪些坑梳理
- Author -
沙砾_- Original Sources -
声明:登载此文出于传递更多信息之目的,并不意味着赞同其观点或证实其描述。
Tags in this post...
Reply on: @reply_date@
@reply_contents@